March 16, 2009
It’s about communication, people.
There was just too much to agree with in Shelby Steele’s column, today. (Thank you Little Miss Attila!) For whatever it’s worth, let me offer whatever insight I may think I have.
We—conservatives, libertarians, Republicans—have a communication issue. We don’t effectively communicate our positions on the issues, or more importantly, we don’t frame (and, by this, I don’t mean lie in order to dupe the public to receive more votes) it in a way that relates to their lives that allows them to understand how “Republican” principles are more in line with their views and self-interest than the Democrat’s policies.
Plain and simple, the Democrats are buying their votes, with policies that only harm the communities whose votes they are buying. Once again, we let the Democrats frame the issues to make it sound like our policies, or our objections to theirs, are selfish and designed to protect the rich. Unfortunately, too many of our spokespeople get caught up defending themselves against wild accusations rather than just exposing the truth about the harmful results of these sound-good Democrat policies.
Welfare has hurt the black and minority communities more than any other by creating incentives that have destroyed these communities. Opposition to school-choice disproportionately hurts the black and minority communities by dooming their children to a failed system and leaving them with no options to better their children’s lives. Illegal immigration also disproportionately hurts the black and minority communities because it places them out of jobs that are most likely to give them a stable economic footing, helping them to do better and, therefore, create a better tomorrow for their children.
So, why are we losing on all of these fronts? Because the policies sound good on the surface and the Republicans have continued to let themselves be put on the defensive, rather than taking the time to explain how these policies hurt minority communities rather than help them. Instead of explaining how school-choice helps them, they’re out proclaiming how they have black friends.
People have often been offended by what I write. I can’t apologize for that; this is just how I write. It’s who I am. But, I have yet to find a person of the opposing view who I can’t find a common ground without me compromising on any of my views. Unlike most people I know, I come into contact with a diverse (racially, politically, socio-economically) group of people. If you give me long enough, I can get anyone to agree with me on something, and I don’t do this using trickery. I’m not the salesman who could sell ice cubes to an Eskimo. I’m genuine and people who talk to me know that.
The truth is, true conservative (libertarian (?), classical liberal (?)) ideas work and people respond to them. Republicans (sorry for the broad generalization) don’t communicate this, and don’t take the message to the people. They allow themselves and their message to be manipulated by the press.
And, because I can’t let this go without making the point, it doesn’t help when people wearing the Republican label aren’t living up to what that label is supposed to mean. I have made this point before, about myself, I came over from being a liberal, yet I never bought the party tag. Why is that? Because, I can’t defend myself and my beliefs against the hypocrisy that most Republican politicians represent. Based on their votes, they don’t represent me. Don’t kowtow, articulate! If you love Reagan so much, take a lesson from him.
Comments (4)4 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

[...] have talked about before; our message, but more specifically how we allow the left to frame things. Monique Stuart hits on this pretty well after reading Shelby Steele’s article from the [...]
Pingback by Seymour Nuts » Framing the Debate and Getting the Message Out — March 16, 2009 @ 11:51 pm
Slightly off topic..
but are you a Douglas Adams reader per chance?
Comment by Dave C — March 17, 2009 @ 12:43 am
You hint at another major theme here:
“Plain and simple, the Democrats are buying their votes”
Patronage made Rome great. You need something, you find a power broker, relinquish a bit of liberty, and get what you need. Then you owe the patron.
Humans have a sheepish instinct to get flocked up.
The argument I try to make with those who seem to favor this is that such self-flocking should be kept to the state level: any sober read of the Constitution should argue against a huge chunk of the last 100 years of domestic policy.
But we’ve been flocking around for so long now that people take it for granted. This is why our Community-Orgainzer-in-Chief (COC) is such a swell guy. Somebody has to drive these lousy ideas off the cliff. He’ll easily have scored more domestic protesters in 80 days than the predecessor in 8 years. Go, go, BHO!
Comment by smitty1e — March 17, 2009 @ 7:39 am
At the present time, we have no conservative major political party in the USA. What we have instead is two left-liberal parties, one more so than the other, but both decidedly leftist. Therefore I cannot call myself either a Republican or a Democrat because I am a conservative.
Your discussion seems to conflate conservatives, libertarians, Republicans, but I would like to say to you that these are very different things and cannot be lumped together. To do so is to lead to muddled thinking that is a part of our problems today, and will avoid getting to a solution.
Comment by Dr.D — March 17, 2009 @ 9:35 pm